Himalayan Herders Reaction Essay

The get Himalayan Herders portrayed cumulation pastoralists from Himalaya. This movie cover umteen points on the lifestyle of these indigenous pot. This documentary styled film covers umteen aspects of ethnography. This ranges from religion, to death ceremonies. This video did a very(prenominal) good job of depiction these people and it was very ethnographic round it. As far as ethnography is concerned, this film is full of it. This group of people is considered pastoralists. This means that they deal to remain in one area. Also, they are farmers and herders.An example of this is how potatoes are the secure of their diet. An example of how they are herders includes how they raise Zomo, which are cows in combine with yaks. This is because theses pastoralists use the milk of a cow for many things but spicy at higher altitudes, which yaks can handle. There is definitely a socio-economic class of labor among the genders. The women are responsible for tending to the Zomo, mil king them and making butter from the milk. The women to a fault rescue help from the children. While the children are helping, they are also cultivation how to tend the Zomo for future responsibilities.Essentially the only responsibility the men have in regards to the Zomo is taking them out to feed, while the women have to take the prison term to milk them, churn butter, and make cheese. Something else that men are responsible for nonetheless includes creating objects and art out of color dyed butter for a ceremonial occasion called the Nara. Men also have the responsibility of per diversenessing the rituals at the Nara. an familyer(a)(prenominal) aspect of pastoralist culture covered here was their economic governance. For a while, the mountain pastoralists of the Himalayas didnt use a coin or paper form of currency. more often than not, grain was considered currency.Grain could be traded for tools and useful things for the group. More recently however, coin currency has be en used. Coin currency can be traded for sheep and vica-versa. Sheep are another important part of their lives. Sheep were of course used for their fleece and the women had the responsibility to turn the wool into textiles to be worn or for other uses. The wool was turned into a yarn same(p) string by hand, by tightening it up. After that, the women used a series of sticks and intricately created fabric which was its useable form. The point of view of this film is in the form of a fibber.A narrator educates the viewers on the twenty-four hours to day lives of these people with the occasional interview-style scene which would include an individual from this particular participation speaking about an aspect of it. With this style, we get to hear about what the people within the group think and how they feel about certain topics. I dont believe the narrator is biased because it seems to me that they have through a lot of studying this society and instead of bounteous opinions, is giving generalizations and genuine facts. I believe that the people that where studied would generally dampen us the same information the narrator provided.This is because, as stated above, the narrator is essentially just sticking to the facts and presenting to us in the same steering the individuals in the group would. If anything, this film shows empathy. The narrator shows no sign of tactile property sorry for this group when he talks and is just presenting the information for us to perceive. The narrator seems to have an understanding of the culture and does not show fretfulness in the least second. After watching the film, I dont dislike the group either however, I also wouldnt give voice I admire them. I feel indifferent towards them.They are deviation about their lives, surviving the way they know how to and the way that was taught to them which is rewardful. It would be very easy for them to just stop and let technology do everything for them like we do here but th ey carry on living dewy-eyed lives. In all honesty, I suppose I feel respect for them. I believe it would be fantastic to live a round-eyed life and really only have to worry about what occasional tasks lie ahead of you. Although it would be nice, it would also be nearly impractical for someone in our culture such as me to just dominate everything and go move into a mountain.This culture is honestly not a lot like my own. In my society we shop in market stores whereas in this culture they basically make everything they use from scratch. Its austere to find a similarity except a little bit in the death ceremony. In the death ceremony, the dead is put into a wooden get along where no spirits can enter. When someone in America is buried, this is also done in a wooden box but a much more intricate one. The school body is also much different. There is barely a school system there. If Im not mistaken, a school system is a very new concept for them where here, school is life.In c onclusion, this film did a great job of describing the mountain pastoralists of the Himalayas. It was very ethnographic and covered many aspects of their culture. The narrator also did not appear to have any biases. That is a huge part of learning about a society. It is always shell to have a narrator that just relays information to you and then cut to a scene of an individual within the group talking about it. That way, we could get a better scope of their lives. All in all, this film did a great job educating everyone who has viewed it about the life and culture of these precise pastoralists.