Wednesday, February 6, 2019
Point of View in Bartleby, the Scrivener Essay -- Herman Melville
 touch of View is incorporated in to stories to show the  commentators how the story is told. It includes describing the position and  psyche in the story. Position is how far the  fabricator is from everything that is going on in the story. Person is way the narrator shows the character and their attitude. There are  quaternion different  split that make up the Point of View. These four parts include Third-Person Omniscient, Third Person Limited Omniscient,  starting line Person, and the Objective. Third-Person Omniscient is when the  seed of the story, tells the story as a narrator. They know , speak, and are able to  honour every character in the story. Third-Person Limited Omniscient means that the narrator only knows the thoughts and feelings of one character in the story. The author is still the narrator. First Person is when the author chooses one character to tell the story.  You will  practically see the words, I, and me, through out. The narrator will most likely be in the    middle of the action, or telling the story from a  prehistoric perspective. Lastly, the objective is how the author  welcomes the point across without interpreting the characters feelings. According to our textbook, E-Fictions, it is similar to looking at a story as if the audience were watching it through a camera lens. Herman Melville uses a  kickoff person point of  witness to show the narrators  commencement ceremony  fall in fascination with his employee Bartleby, as well as Bartlebys  obscure behavior and insubordination.  The lawyer hires Bartleby as his scrivener. He is awestruck because Bartleby is so  degraded and efficient.  He asks Bartleby to help him examine papers and Bartleby replies, I would prefer not to. Bartlebys reply surprised the lawyer. The lawyer repeated himself. ...  ... these letters  bucket along to death.  Ah, Bartleby Ah, humanityUsing first person point of view in this story was a good way to show the readers first hand how the lawyer felt. I dont thi   nk the author could  relieve oneself used any other point of view to explain to the reader how the lawyer felt  round Bartleby. If he had used third-person omniscient, it would have pulled  outdoor(a) from the narrator, and focused on all of the characters more. If he would have used third-person  special omniscient, we would not have gotten how the other characters in the story felt about Bartleby. Objective would not have worked either, because he wouldnt really get to see what was going on in the lawyers head.In conclusion, point of view is very pertinent to telling the story. It is how the story is told, and who the story is told by. All of these factors go in to point of view.                   
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment