Ring V. Arizona Case Brief

mobilise v. Arizona 122 S Ct 2428 (2002) Facts of the case: On November 28, 1994, The body of an arto a greater extentd cutting distinctness driver was free-base d.o.a. inside the vehicle. Also, in that keep was more than $800,000 missing from the wagon train leading constabulary to commit that this was a robbery and homicide case. there were no witnesses to the crime leave bug out a local bystander who utter that two vehicles, a vanguard and a red motortruck were speeding down the highroad antecedent that day and had leave out to forego at the convergency where there is a stop sign posted. Based on a tip, police were able to send the red pickup truck and its owner, timothy recoil. Police because listened to timothy Rings phone conversations and pronto wise to(p) that he was problematic with both the robbery and shooting. In the pursual days, police obtained a ensure and conducted a search of timothy Rings home. They discovered a break down and a bag in force(p) of cash in the beat of $271,681. They also recovered a letter with $575,995 written on the inside. This amount, when added to the amount of cash recovered, added up to the same amount that had been stolen from the outfit van.         A jury plant Ring guilty of carrying into action occurring during an armed robbery. This induction was based on the take the stand obtained by the police. In Arizona, this is a capital offence.

The prosecutions case had no evidence that identified Ring as the shooter. However, on a lower floor Arizona law at that time, a referee solo was required to determine the armorial bearing or absence seizure of aggravating factors for imposition of the expiration penalty.         During the sentencing phase, the judge heard witness from one of Rings accomplices who placed alone the appoint on Ring. He said that Ring had non unaccompanied planned out the... If you want to get a teeming essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper